Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE

The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, section 10 (4) and 11, was not reported to the police for three days even though the testimony of testimony was only two furlongs away from the place of police presence by the complainant. The reason given was that the delay was not appealed to the affected girl after she was not examined by the police for eight days after her recovery by the investigating officer and the explanation presented by her in this regard. Not credible, the male suspect cannot possibly commit the crime of adultery. The victim in her house, located in a densely populated area in the presence of her mother and four young sisters, although the victim allegedly opposed the Xena Bill Jaber Commission, according to her medical report No trace of violence was found on his body. However, even though they are unmarried, they were accustomed to having sex, no male member of the complaining party had come forward to join the investigation, and he encouraged people to tell the story of the abduction incident. During his detention by the accused, no motive and crying took place, as the prosecution alleged, did not happen and, together with the investigating officer, he received his acquittal. The complainant and the victim had made a case against the accused by dishonestly investigating, the accused was acquitted in these circumstances, however, strict and exemplary action was directed against the concerned investigating officer. advocates from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer