RUKHSANA YASMEEN versus MUHAMMAD DIN
Pakistan Penal Code Section 354A / 452 / 337A (ii) / 337 L (ii) / 337 F (i) i 337 H (ii) / 148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 439 by Transfer Session The court granted the magistrate's verdict for trial by the sessions court, at the request of the defendant, the trial court moved the magistrate on the ground that the provisions of section 354A, PPC were not attracted to the facts of the case. The plaintiffs disclosed in the preliminary evidence recorded on the record by the complainant, along with the magistrate statement of the incident recorded in the private complaint, as well as the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the testimony of the witnesses, that Section 354A, P.P.C. The necessary components were available first, so that the private complaint allegedly ordered the trial of the accused for the said offense, in addition to other offenses, once the sessions court asked the defendant to stand trial in the complainant's case. Was it not appropriate to sue? His request for a premature inquiry into the trial before the trial to see if the evidence available at the stage had revealed any of these offenses, which the defendant already had in the Sessions Court. An earlier order was available for review, as there was no basis for passing an improper order, especially in the absence of any fresh material on record in this regard, which was approved by the Sessions Court. The deprecated order was granted requesting an illegal, inaccurate, and inappropriate review
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Allahabad lawyer