DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED versus PUNJAB ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD.
Trademark Registration Act 1940 Sections 24 and 76 Registration of trademarks Opposition to the phonetic matching appellant in the two trademarks was not permitted by the Registrar of Trademarks and the trademark of the defendant was entered, in which the trade numbers of both parties were phonetically Were the same and had the same class effect where the Registrar tests and standards developed by the courts to determine the question of trademark matching with another and the possibility of confusion and fraud according to the law. Failure to advertise, by law, such order was registrar's discretion The order passed by the Registrar with the consent of the parties was set aside and the case was remanded to pass a new order on merit as per law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from FR Bannu lawyer