IMAM DIN versus ABDUL KARIM
The appeal of the appeal against the decision of the hiring controller was not virtually filed by the Sindh Tenant Premises Ordinance 1979, the tenant, but was filed by his brother, the tenant. The appeal was shown in the memorandum as the case, but the appeal was neither signed nor affirmed. This was confirmed by the tenant and instead by the tenant's brother. The lawyer was also signed by the tenant's brother and no option was filed by the tenant's brother to file an appeal through him, in the circumstances, it could not be said. The eviction order was filed by the tenant, under which the tenant's appeal was rejected by the tenant as not fit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer
