Find a Lawyer

KHAIR DIN versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

In the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the XML suit for the possession of the plaintiffs / defendants claimed that the property in the dispute was an independent shop, which was transferred by the settlement to the department, while the defendant / The claimant claimed that the property was a part of the house which the courts below, based on the unauthorized demarcation of the deputy administrator pending property in the absence of the plaintiff / applicant, dismisses the case below. The main point of the court's determination I made was whether the property claimed by the plaintiff was linked. The property was transferred to the defendants or it was an independent property. Such a dispute can be easily resolved by the local courts appointed by a local commissioner who can visit the spot and see where the disputed property really lies. Both courts did not properly read the documentary evidence produced by the parties. , But relied on a document that would otherwise have no significant value, was not prepared in the same way as the law and the orders of the following courts were set aside and the actual dispute between the parties was decided. The case was remanded for whether the portion of the property in the dispute was transferred to the claimant / applicant or to an independent property. Located somewhere by the appointment of a local commissioner and after giving evidence to the parties and presenting evidence famous supreme court advocate from Sagri lawyer