Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Identification of evidence in case BF cross version of both parties prescription of Pakistan Panel Code Sections 337A (ii), 337A (iv), 337F (i), 337F (vi), 148, 149 and, 411 evidence Determining which party was the victim of the aggression, the suspect's case remained unknown through the prosecution during the trial, the complaining party's complaint was that one of the accused had had illicit relations with one of his women and That would be naturally outrageous. The complaining party had against the accused version of the complaining party the fact that the incident happened in front of the accused's house and a member of the complaining party was armed with a gun and six persons were hurt. But none of the prosecution's witnesses described their injuries. The two courts did not publicize what and how the injuries were caused by the prosecution through the prosecution. Without doubt, the defendant had not been able to prove his case against the accused, the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused and the judgment and sentence of both the courts were kept down. immigration advocates contact from Nowshera lawyer