MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus AHMAD MUBARIK, S.S.P., BAHAWALPUR
The accused police officer, accused of violating the contempt of court High Court order, 3/4 contempt of court Act 1976, repeatedly expressed his sincere contempt, demanded unconditional apology and in the future. The accused were accused of being cautious, following the order of the High Court. The constitution was approved and the other candidates were also appointed on the appointment of constables who had obtained the required number. According to the report of the DIG accused, the accused was a dedicated and hard working police officer and his job, The role and conduct of the Board was beyond the powers of the High Court. Under the circumstances, a gentleman in this case accepted the unconditional apology offered by the accused in which he was warned that he would be more careful in the future.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Khandabad lawyer