Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SYED ABDUS SATTAR versus THE STATE


West Pakistan Land Reform Regulation 1959 West Pakistan Land Reform Regulation, 1959, Para 9 (f) A gift of land made after August 14, 1947 is not available to donor living under paragraph 9 (f).

P L D 1966 W. P. (Rev.) 17

Before I. U. Khan, Chief Land Commissioner, West Pakistan

Syed ABDUS SATTAR‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Revision No. 101 of 1958‑59, decided on 18th August 1959.

West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959

, para. 9(f) Gift of land made after 14th August 1947‑Donor alive -Concession permissible under paragraph 9(f) not available to donee.

Muhammad Sadiq for Petitioner.

ORDER

This revision has been filed against an order dated the 29th of July 1959, passed y the Land Commissioner, D. I. Khan, whereby he upheld the order of the Deputy Land Commissioner who had refused to allow the petitioner to avail of the concessions permissible' under para. 9 (f) of the Martial Law Regulation No. 64.

The facts of the case are that, at the time of the scrutiny of Forms LC.‑I and LC.‑II, it transpired that the petitioner was a donee who had received a gift after the 14th of August 1947, and the donor was still alive. He was, therefore, refused the availability of concessions permissible under para. 9 (f) of the Martial Law Regulation No. 64.

At the same time, the Deputy Land Commissioner passed certain orders about compensation.

The petitioner went in appeal. So far as compensation was concerned, the Land Commissioner accepted the appeal but, so far as the concessions permissible under para. 9 (f ) were concerned, he rejected it. Hence this revision.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. His main contention is that this is a special case as the property was gifted to the petitioner as a result of family settlement in accordance with the established custom of the family. The fact, however, remains that it was gift made after the 14th of August 1947. The petitioner is a donee and the donor is still alive. He cannot, therefore, avail of the concessions permissible under para. 9 (f) of the Martial Law Regulation No. 64. No interference is called for. The revision fails and is rejected hereby.

S. Q. Revision rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Dera Bugti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.