THE STATE THROUGH REGIONAL DIRECTOR ANF versus IKRAMULLAH
Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 243, Amendment Petitions Under Hearing and Smuggling Drugs That Increased Punishment, Demanded Extradition of Offender During Trial, Effect of Trial Court The defendants (defendants) were arrested before the trial court filed all the evidence of the prosecution, which the accused submitted, pleading guilty and saying they belonged to poor families. That they remained unemployed despite attempts to find a legal profession and, for these reasons, became involved in drug trafficking. That they had learned their lesson in prison, and because of their abusive activities, their families were suffering, the trial court found the accused under Section 9 (c) of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 Sentenced and sentenced to 18 months in prison for each of them. The prosecution, with a fine of Rs 30,000, claimed that it had tried a case against the accused of recovering large quantities of heroin, but the trial court sentenced them to lesser convictions, which deal with Section 9 (c) of the Drug Control. Of the provisions of the Agreement. Act, 1997 The legitimate prosecutor did not present any reliable ocular or circumstantial evidence to establish the allegation, but it was the defendants themselves, who submitted the petition to the trial court, and they charged themselves. Kept at the mercy of the court. Respect for their convictions The court has always taken a gentle approach when a person confesses to the allegations leveled against him, the trial court had the right to show Lee's modesty in relation to the sentencing of the accused.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
