ABDUL AZIZ versus MAQSOOD AHMED
The Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 12 and 20, by providing oral and documentary evidence on record for the specific performance of the plaintiff of the contract, proved that a valid contract of sale was executed between the parties and the plaintiff filed the suit. Receipt of outstanding balance is for this decree The specific performance of the contract could not be approved because the claimant requested alternatives to the outstanding refund, it was withdrawn because when the execution of the sale agreement was proved on record. It was to be respected by the parties and unless the court imposed it. There are compelling reasons for denying such relief, both the courts ruled concurrently on the basis of no evidence, and such evidence based on the evidence on the record is not a misreading or failure to read the evidence. Presence cannot be interrupted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Malakwal lawyer