Find a Lawyer

DILDAR AHMAD versus SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CENTRAL JAIL, MULTAN

Control of Drugs Act 1997 Section 9B Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 397, 382B & 561A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Power to prosecute charges with the High Court The order of injunction, which was charged in two cases, and in each case benefiting Section 2382B, CCPC, was sentenced in two cases, but the trial court's decision was silent on whether the two. The cases have been sentenced. The accused had said that in the benefit of Section 382B, the PC was granted separately in both cases, the convictions in both cases abandoned this fact in the trial court's decision. Despite having to drive at the same time. Accepted its interpretation and insisted that the punishment was to proceed in sequence. The case was registered and dispatched in the first case and proceedings in the first case started earlier than the second case, while the accused was to run continuously in the sentencing sentence till the judgment of the court in section 397, CR. Not provided under PC. The High Court, under its hereditary jurisdiction, was given the authority under Section 1A, A, CCPC to instruct that the subsequent sentence be executed only when the accused was already being sentenced. , Each individual had to examine the matter at his own best interest. The suit, entitled to the exercise of the powers of the accused under Section 61A A, CRPC, accepted the constitutional petition, stating that both the accused, separately, benefitted section 38382B, CCPC. Gone, it's the interest of justice immigration advocates from Sajawal lawyer