HAMID KHAN ACHAKZAI versus BEHRAM KHAN ACHAKZAI
Section 33, 46, Election?, & 69 and 69 and Election 70 completely invalidate the election petition. Has been charged for re-counting. There was no objection to any irregularities in relation to the remaining polling stations, stating that the selection of polling stations cannot be nullified and voter turnout was not ignored just because. It can be argued that six polling stations, illegal and irregular, were found during the polling process simply because the re-calculation resulted in the applicant having 688 votes over respondent No.1, It received more votes from respondents. Representation of the People's Act, 1976 was approved in such circumstances and the respondent allowed notification under it was declared a return candidate; the Election Commission was directed to issue a notification in favor of the applicant. In order to declare them a successful candidate for the respective constituency.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Chitral lawyer