Find a Lawyer

TAHIR MAHMOOD versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 claimed the presence of witnesses at a short distance from the incident and confirmed each other on all material facts, the incident was recognized and as a criminal weapon. But there were no material facts, including the use of a knife. Contrary to the prosecutor's testimony, the defendant's injury to the defendant in front of the Octave Post against the operation of the shop, his presence said that the testimony of the prosecutor at his shop at the relevant time could not be denied, in particular. When the accused was not able to refute the claim of the prosecution witness, the incident at the shop at the relevant time took place in a public place on Pika Road in which the accused's house as well as the victim's own home were killed. The presence of the deceased at home and on the road was neither objectionable nor could the accused benefit. Being a resident of the area did not have a background of previous hostility and witness freedom was not objectionable due to minor contradictions and contradictions. Injuries to the deceased person would not negate the evidence of natural witnesses. It is alleged that he is a resident of a place near Jakodai, his presence in Oktoberi will not be the unnatural circumstances under which this incident took place. The site showed that the suspect was on fire during a meeting with the deceased and had a quarrel with a knife blow on the most sensitive part of the body of the deceased, leading to the incident that resulted in the accident. There was a horrific incident in which the accused had the same blow with a knife. Kill your uncle with no other purpose tax advocates from Sudhnoti lawyer