Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUNIR versus MUBAMMAD YOUSAF

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 133 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (X67I of 1967), SS: 7 and 117 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R67 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Publicly Defendants The public defendants crossing the public road filed a complaint against the Trial Court against the Thane Court, after which the Spot Inspection instructed the Revenue Officer to identify the property in compliance with the trial court's order and the Revenue Officer. Delegated action and prepared its report, which found the respondents overwhelming. According to the report filed by the trial court in public proceedings, the applicant filed a constitutional petition to expedite the matter and the High Court accepted the petition and directed the T trial court to grant the petitioner's permission. Instead of deciding the complaint filed within the stipulated time, the trial court should instruct the trial court to proceed with the report rather than follow the authorized report. The Revenue Officer, who was produced after the Spot Ins, was already in the file and in compliance with the trial court's directive, the Circle Circle was requested that the Circle Circle not take any action as per the trial court's directive, It has been stated that the applicant's complaint was rejected and the order dismissing was confirmed in the amendment. Validity courts should have considered the preliminary report prepared by the competent authority on which the respondents considered it. The orders of the extradition by the courts were approved on the report of the lord gurdwara which There was no authorized authority in mind registration advocate from Dhirkot lawyer