Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMHD YAR AND OTHERS versus MST. BAKHAT SAWAI


Civil Procedure Code Order III, O III, r 4 Power of Attorney Genius has not been established for CPC recognized agents and pliers Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), which cannot be mentioned in Power of Attorney.

P L D 1966 W. P. (Rev.) 131(1)

Before I. U. Khan, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan

MUHAMMHD YAR AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

Mst. BAKHAT SAWAI‑Respondent.

Revision No. 1282 of 1962‑63, decided on 8th September 1964.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908),

O. III, r. 4‑Power of attorney‑Genuineness not established‑Counsel mentioned in power of attorney cannot appear in case.

Rana Abdur Rahim for Petitioners.

Munawwar Hussain for Respondent.

ORDER

In this case, the learned counsel for the respondent that Muhammad Yar died on 30‑1‑1962 has pointed it out. I, however, find that the power of attorney which is filed with this revision petition bear the thumb‑impression of Muhammad Yar. Sahib Yar who is one of the petitioners and is present says that he did not file this power of attorney, but gave one to his counsel, Rana Abdur Rahim, which was signed by him. This is a case in which prima facie a criminal offence has been committed. Separate action is being taken to hand over Sahib Yar to the Police for necessary action.

It may be added that Allah Bakhsh whose thumb‑impression is also on the power of attorney is present and says that he never filed the power of attorney; that means that the thumb-impression of Allah Bakhsh is not also genuine.

With a view to ensuring that the power of attorney is not subsequently changed, I have signed and dated it.

So far as the case is concerned, Allah Bakhsh the alleged petitioner does not say that he filed the petition. Sahib Yar says that the power of attorney filed with the case is not his. Muhammad Ramzan petitioner is absent in spite of service. Rana Abdur Rahim cannot represent him because the genuineness of the power of attorney is not established. Muhammad Yar has already died and no attempts were made to bring his legal respresentative on record.

The petition cannot, therefore, be said to have been regularly instituted in my Court. It is, therefore, dismissed.

K. M. A. Revision dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Makran lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.