Find a Lawyer

KISHWAR SULTANA versus MUHAMMAD NAZIR

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 12 (2) and 115 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 12 and 42 of the Declaration of Settlement Agreement were challenged on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation that the plaintiff / applicant (wife) ) Instead, the suit claims ownership of the property. In Dover, a lawsuit was filed against the defendant / defendant, which her husband's trial court dismissed, but the appellate court ruled on the basis of a compromise between the parties. I made a sale agreement in favor of that. The specific performance of the contract was filed between her and the plaintiff's husband, which was subject to adjournment; the respondent, who filed the specific performance of the contract against the applicant's husband, CPC It is alleged that the agreement was issued jointly (by the wife against the husband) to frustrate the sale agreement between her and the other respondents, the NT (petitioner's husband) said. In accepting the court, the respondent said that the respondent should be involved in the matter as a party. H which was hit was not a party, the PC application can be filed with the qualification. Accepted by the appellate court, the appellate court passed the order, and the review cannot be interfered with, enabling the parties to present evidence in support of their respective claims. registration advocate from Mailsi lawyer