ALLAH DINO versus MIR KHAN
O VI, R 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Amendment of Constitutional Petition Correction of Clare's Error in the Trial, Amendment sought by the Plaintiff was allowed but only because the lower appellate court Denied, though no evidence was presented. By the time a suit was filed or the property description would be changed only once the amended lawsuit was filed, the defendant was always given the opportunity to make the amended writing Enter the statement, the respondents will not face any prejudice. By way of such modification of the petitions, the order of the lower appellate court was without legal authority and had no legal effect, in which case constitutional application was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Ratto Dero lawyer
