MUHAMMAD ZAFARYAB versus MALIK MUHAMMAD IQBAL
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 100 Second Appeal Suit for Specific Performance of Contract to Sell In the Second Appeal, the Respondent acknowledged the impression of his thumb on the contract of sale and presented his evidence. I explained that the impression of the thumb was obtained on a blank paper by a police officer The appellant disputed that the respondent had not filed a lawsuit to cancel the contract for sale. And did not raise any objection to the thumb impressions in his written statement, therefore, please note below Was obliged to separate from the investigation to a court. The contradictions identified by the appellant were not material and the finding after proper definition of the evidence against the appellants was not the result of misrepresentation or reading of the record. Identify any part of the evidence that was or was not read by the courts or was co-operative or lacked any material misconduct
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer