Find a Lawyer

RAFIULLAH KAKAR versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 392/377/452/506/34 The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), section 10 (3) and 12 was deferred evidence for four days without cause and contradictions. According to the prosecution witnesses, the incident did not take place in the manner described by the complainant and her husband and they tried their best to conceal the facts and distorted the story which led to the only suspicious incident. Was born which will cause doubt. The court's mind was sufficient to deny the prosecution's case, and it was not necessary that there should be many circumstances to create suspicion. Medical evidence did not confirm the evidence of the expert's report about the victim's pants. I was allegedly stained with semen for human semen but the accused's semen was not sent to examine so that a matching report could be obtained, delaying reporting of the case to the victim and her husband, exaggerated. Due to the contradiction of the witnesses in the opinions and statements, their testimony was made suspicious and untrustworthy which The trial against the accused has not been proved and the accused has been sentenced under the trial. , Was set aside law firms from Morgah lawyer