Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN versus OMAR NICHOLAS & COMPANY (PAKISTAN)


CPC Civil Procedure Code Order IV Matter Rehabilitation and Determination of Suites on Law Matters or OVII, R2 and O XIV, R1 Partnership Act (IX pf 1932), Section 59 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) , Article 185 (3) withholding suit for restitution of money, no such matters were set forth in the written statement on the non-registration of the suit, retaining the suit and non-registration of the contribution nor the above objections. There was neither a trial court nor any finding on the said matters before it was given; the decision of the appellate court (division bench of the high court) was also barred by such objections. I was silent, before the High Court on questions which were not requested, can not consider them. For the first time, a leave application for appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Tando Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.