RIAZ HUSSAIN versus ALLAH DITTA
Plaintiffs filed a request for a date for extension of the plaintiffs under Section 21 and 22 for filing a weak fifth case, before the defendant filed an application in which he prayed that the waste be harvested. Because he is not in it. In a position to pay cash, it should be allowed to present the security which was accepted and the plaintiff has the time to make any break on the powers of the trial court, section 22, the provisions of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913. Was not extended, was provided. The trial court allowed the plaintiff to present the security in lieu of a fixed term, instead of submitting the security in cash or in connection with it, the trial court The order approved by could not be interrupted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kurram Agency lawyer
