JALILUR REHMAN versus THE DEPUTY COLONIZATION OFFICER
The Gudu Barrage Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Gudu Barrage Land Grant was initially granted in favor of the applicant which was later canceled so that the cancellation order failed to be canceled by the authority but both the courts Decided the matter. Finally, in favor of the applicant, the respondent sought a preliminary review which was hearing in the High Court while hearing the petitioner's case in the trial court, the defendant succeeded in obtaining the piece of land in his favor. Received. Proceedings before the trial court Despite the fact that the two courts jointly decided the case in favor of the applicant, the authorities refused to cancel the property grant in favor of the applicant. The civil court declared the grant to be ineffective in favor of the defendant and there was no legal effect not to disclose the grant of disputed land in its favor, the respondent being the culprit who had obtained the judicial orders passed by the authorities. He was accused of suppressing material facts and was granted without legal authority. Such orders were set aside for no legal effect. On one hand
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
