MUHAMMAD YOUSUF KURESHY versus IMRAN HASSAN KHAN
Representation of the People's Act 1976, Sections 52, 103 and 104 Election Request Illegal and Evidence of Evidence of Corruption The selection of the returning candidate was called into question - on the basis of allegations of illegal and misconduct in elections and on this basis But even though the provisions contained in the provisions were violated by the People's Act, 49 and 50 of 1976, the returning candidate, Burden, relied on the applicants / failed candidates to prove all such allegations. , By presenting credible and convincing evidence, the applicant accused her of having to rely In the absence of so much material on the record that the returning candidate was involved in illegal and corrupt practices that would have allowed him to remain in office, the selection of the returning candidate could not be nullified.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Naseerabad lawyer