SECRETARY COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN versus DAD BAKHSH
Sections 79, 80, 82, O III, R 1, O VI, R 14, O VIII, Rr 3 & 5, O IX, R 6 (1), O XII, R 6, O XXVII, Rr 3 and 8 Qanun E Shaheedat (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 119 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 2 suit against the provincial government and its officials, spent by a contractor, the plaintiff, on the occasion of a visit to his senior officers. Plaintiff's claim against the State Government and its officials on receipt of the money, on the public defendants and not only on them, in the written statement filed by their lawyer, the plaintiff's claim in the written statement Non-specific denial and failure to appear in court thereafter Former party order passed against yjh government records without evidence. The order restraining the possession of the auction buyer by the Government Rest House and the trial court in the execution of the ex parte decree, and the order in the execution proceedings approved by the trial court by the appellate court, shows that 3 1996 The lawsuit was filed in 1996. In Pasni before the judge, while the next date for appointment of the defendants, including the Secretary of Government in E Quetta, was set on 5-6 1996, ie only one day's record further states that the official defendants on subsequent dates Had sought the Secretary's leave without authorization, which was approved by the trial court. Without finding out the truth about the proper service of the summons by the Secretary or the issuance of a new summons, the claimants in the written statement did not recognize the claim of the plaintiff, the trial was based on trial only. And consider a pre-trial injunction without the recording of evidence
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
