Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD YOUSIF versus MUHAMMAD SULLEMAN


The Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 paragraph, 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) recognized the right of the respondents in advance of the Deputy Commissioner while the Additional Commissioner set aside the order of the Deputy Commissioner. And the member confirmed it. The Board of Revenue High Court, exercising its constitutional jurisdiction, accepted the right of the respondents approved by the plaintiff as Additional Commissioner and Member, Board of Revenue Constitution, stating that the High Court was merely to abolish both orders. I was at fault and should be fine. The case has been remanded to one or the other authorities, pending the appeal by the Supreme Court, to consider whether the Supreme Court has rejected the case after the cancellation of these two orders. Was remanded to.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Silanwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.