Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ


The final conclusions of the two courts of fact under section 115 and 100 amending jurisdiction, however, cannot be disturbed by the CPC, however, in exercising the jurisdiction under the high civil court 5 under 115. Two courts have either not provided false evidence during the recording of the facts. Or neglected any material piece of evidence to be recorded or fact-finding by the two courts below, it is the High Court's jurisdiction that interferes with the finding of facts in the jurisdiction of the review under section 115. The CPC was narrow, the High Court held that under this jurisdiction only interference with the order of the subordinate courts; the court below assumed jurisdiction which was not binding on it or by law. Failure to exercise the jurisdiction granted or the court below affecting its jurisdiction Had dealt with material anomalies.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Hyderabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.