NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ
The final conclusions of the two courts of fact under section 115 and 100 amending jurisdiction, however, cannot be disturbed by the CPC, however, in exercising the jurisdiction under the high civil court 5 under 115. Two courts have either not provided false evidence during the recording of the facts. Or neglected any material piece of evidence to be recorded or fact-finding by the two courts below, it is the High Court's jurisdiction that interferes with the finding of facts in the jurisdiction of the review under section 115. The CPC was narrow, the High Court held that under this jurisdiction only interference with the order of the subordinate courts; the court below assumed jurisdiction which was not binding on it or by law. Failure to exercise the jurisdiction granted or the court below affecting its jurisdiction Had dealt with material anomalies.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
