Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/395/396 Anti-Terrorist Act (XXVII of 1997), the Section 25 appellate accused which had not pressed the appeal and withdrew it, had merely requested that the sentence be served simultaneously. The order on which the prosecution had no objection. The accused was convicted on two counts, firstly, 2302 (b), life imprisonment and fines under PPC and secondly 95 95, would have to face ten years imprisonment under PPC while committing robbery. If the crime was proved, the accused should have been sentenced. Under section 6396, instead of section 959595 under PPC, the sentence and sentence of the PPC were amended to allow sentences to run concurrently.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Ukba lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.