Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR versus STATE

The witnesses were concerned not only with the deceased, but they also hated the accused party, and their evidence was free of any unidentified evidence. Did not confirm the evidence. The character's circumstances did not support the prosecution's version, but it was in direct conflict; despite the presence of a large number of people, no respected member of the eligible area was involved in the recovery process, according to the report. The crime was reported to have been cleared by a forensic science laboratory with a gun recovered from the suspect, which was not the case of the prosecutor. Ocular testimony was not in accordance with medical evidence. It seems that this incident has actually been seen and cannot be relied upon. The charge of a major capital even exaggerated the evidence in which the five innocent persons were asked to be involved in the case. Was a fraudulent and fabricated trial case set up under the trial. In such a situation incredible and unpredictable and the absence of motivation took on importance The accused was acquitted in the circumstances. list of advocates from Rashidabad lawyer