MUHAMMAD AZIM versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
No material was available on record at the time of the trial court's decision to remove the deficiency in section 148 and 149 court fees of Civil Code 1908, nor any finding by the trial court to conclude this result. Given that the wrong value of this case is significant. The purpose of the judicial fee was or was there something in the judicial fee that the trial court had to set up in the whole case, it was not that the court fee was payable. And the lower appellate court ruling, rejecting the trial court's order that allowed it to meet the court fee reduction within 10 days, was rejected and the trial court's order restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Noshki lawyer