MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus MUNSHI KHAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973: Approval of prior facts for the abolition of land under Article 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 85 (3) S19, Government Land Acquisition (Punjab) Act, 1912 prepared by such Board of Revenue. Was subsequently withdrawn under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under which the Board of Revenue's order was revoked, under which this sanction was withdrawn. The leave was granted by the Supreme Court for appeal on whether the members (colonies) in the Board of Revenue were eligible for ex post facto permission to abolish the land under section 19 of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912. For this purpose, under this constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court could have interfered with the order to rescind the sanction, which had an effect on the condition of the elimination of the land in the Convention Deed? In favor of the original allottee, and whether approval was required under section 19 of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act 1912, to separate the land; can the Additional Commissioner (Revenue) somehow divide the land between the parties concerned? What was the effect of this decision, when no approval was granted under Section 19 of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912, especially when the Provincial Government was not a party to the suit and the Member, The Government of Land (Punjab) may approve the ex post facto of the Board of Revenue under section 19 of the Colonization Act, 1912.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer