PAKISTAN LAWYER FORUM versus PERVEZ MUSHARAF
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 (3) Appeal for leave to appeal to the High Court in a constitutional petition filed by the applicant, after the hearing of his constitutional petition has been postponed to await the outcome of the controversial cases in the Supreme Court. Was postponed with the instruction of. The applicant was that the rule of ownership on which the contamination order was based was not upheld by the Supreme Court, which denied the jurisdiction by the High Court to deny access to justice which was the basic right of guarantee. And that the Supreme Court cannot do that. As per Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, follow a constitutional request and allow the party to disregard the High Court. Preventing legal proceedings cannot be construed as abolishing jurisdiction, the matter being a rule, the High Court was competent to regulate. Its own procedure and common practice was that such petitions were laid down by the respective High Courts in a similar case, in the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Punch lawyer