Find a Lawyer

AMIR HAIDER versus SHABBIR AHMAD

Civil Code 1908 Section 115 of the Code of Conduct The trial court and the first appellate court's decisions on the property of the disputed property were inconsistent, the case was dismissed by the former but the latter was ruled in the appeal. ? The trial court and the dispute failed to pay attention to important property-related points because the property was located within the municipal limits, and the reconstruction plan was approved in favor of the defendant in this case until 1957, Accordingly his construction was taken up. Approved plan, that property was listed in the relevant rating record. The property was conveyed by the municipal number to the residential area in the rating area and the house number was recorded as the property of the defendant, which was sufficient to prove that the deceased plaintiff was the deceased plaintiff. There was a deliberate attempt to seize the property. In the circumstances, under section 115, CPC had the jurisdiction to reverse the decision of the first appellate court after it came to the conclusion that it was the result of misrepresentation of material evidence and not to read the material evidence on record. Also suffered. immigration advocates phone number from Gari Mori lawyer