Find a Lawyer

SADIQ HUSSAIN SHAH versus THE STATE

In the light of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 2302, 7 307 and App 353 days, an FIR was registered immediately in which the accused was specifically designated as the real culprit of the crime. I also included an injured witness who could not be suspected of the incident at the place of presence, if there was no hostility against the accused for his false allegations in this case, then the Ocular Evidence specific to the main incident. Were particularly persistent in the role of the accused in the minor modifications or contradictions found in the statements of the witnesses. Yes, they were not equal. Neither did the truthfulness of his statements, which were responsible police officers, medical evidence confirmed the location of the weapon used by the perpetrator and the injuries sustained by the accused, and sufficient help to the eye incident. Was provided. Not only sovereign and undesirable, however, his failure to explain one of the wounds attributable to the dependable and the dying did not damage his reputation, attacking the police was an attack on the state and his Authorities shot and killed the accused while he was still in custody. Neither he nor the police had shown any credibility with the accused in the execution of his duties in order to avoid a breach of the peace, so he did not deserve any relaxation in the case of punishment. And, if extended, would be equivalent to paying citizens licenses to attack or kill state workers whenever citizens had their jurisdiction over them. property advocates from Kurram lawyer