NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus TAUFIQ IMPEX INC.
Banking Companies (Debt, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Act 1997 Section 9 and 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R10 and Section 151 Defend the Case for Recovery of Bank Loan The petition for dismissal was only one person against the plaintiff / account holder officer of Bank Validity, while dismissal of the plaintiff / bank officer was the original beneficiary of the petition under Rule 1, R 10, CPC for removal of the plaintiff / bank officer's name. Gone, because the defendant was an integral party and was properly enforced in the proceedings The plaintiff / bank officer neither presented any evidence nor was it An explanation for the fact that the records on the record show that the defendant / bank officer became attached to the claimant / account builder and that a substantial amount of money was transferred to the former account for his personal benefit. And the suit was decided accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer
