Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

QASIM NAWAZ versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SARGODHA


Punjab Cinematography Rules 1984 Section 8 Punjab Cinematography Rules, 1984, R80 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 292/294 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitions, Naib Tehsildar and arrest of Cinema City Statistrate with some And cell police constables raided the cinema where the blue film was allegedly being screened. Officials are said to have seized the film, sealed the cinema and filed a lawsuit against the cinema licensees, which was buried under section 8 (5) of the Fat Picture Ordinance 1979. The District Magistrate could not step down from the position of a formally authorized police inspector to the City Magistrate, who raided and sealed the cinema, was not a police officer, and even if ordered by the District Magistrate. If he goes, he could not do it. The High Court has declared the film taken by the authorities against the applicant in the use of i illegal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Bhera lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.