Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

QASIM NAWAZ versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SARGODHA


Punjab Cinematography Rules 1984 Section 8 Punjab Cinematography Rules, 1984, R80 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 292/294 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitions, Naib Tehsildar and arrest of Cinema City Statistrate with some And cell police constables raided the cinema where the blue film was allegedly being screened. Officials are said to have seized the film, sealed the cinema and filed a lawsuit against the cinema licensees, which was buried under section 8 (5) of the Fat Picture Ordinance 1979. The District Magistrate could not step down from the position of a formally authorized police inspector to the City Magistrate, who raided and sealed the cinema, was not a police officer, and even if ordered by the District Magistrate. If he goes, he could not do it. The High Court has declared the film taken by the authorities against the applicant in the use of i illegal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from FR Peshawar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.