Find a Lawyer

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE HAIDERI

Release of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Appointments and Regulations of Services) Rules 1977 R 17, Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974) He was removed from the job without having to work as a result of which he was found guilty of tampering with the record, which enabled him to engage in self-service on a regular basis and secure his progress in B. Was also successful in making. Serious allegations against civil servants from B8 would have a lasting impact and could not be backed up because they had committed unjustified condemnation, the High Court dismissed. Was. The High Court had restored the government employee to the job, but did the riots allow the competent authority to move forward, which the Supreme Court did not approve, despite serious allegations such as tampering with the record, It was important that the matter be investigated properly and such person could not be allowed to escape on a technical basis. advocates from Rawat lawyer