Find a Lawyer

HUSSNA versus COMMISSIONER / APPELLATE AUTHORITY

Balochistan Local Government Ordinance 1980 Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Election Returning Officer on seats for special interests (women) workers and farmers accepted the nomination papers of six candidates that no other papers at the time of the candidates. Nominations were not filed. He claimed that he had submitted the nomination papers on time, but the returning officer refused to entertain the nomination papers because the appellate authority accepted the nomination papers of the applicants and directed that the papers be submitted. Receive nominations. At the time, the candidates whose papers had already been accepted filed a constitutional petition against the appellate authority's decision, which was accepted by the High Court by a short order, but the reasons for the approval of the Constitution were almost two or two before the High Court passed. The short order given in the detailed order approved months later was apparently contradictory. The evidence of the High Court, through the short order and detailed judgment according to the record, proved that the nomination papers were filed timely by the applicants, but they were Recreation was denied by the Returning Officer illegally and yes The IA Court did not allow the applicants to reject the position adopted by the Returning Officer. That enabled the other candidates to be elected to the Supreme Court against the other, the appeal of the change of appeal for leave in appeal was upheld by the High Court's decision and the contested election of six candidates without legal authority. Was found. advocates from Qalandarabad lawyer