IMTIAZ ALI KHAN versus STATE
At the stage of the appeal process, the accused filed a request for the deputy superintendent of police to record a statement about the alibi of the suspect, as additional evidence was filed at the stage of the appeal for the recording of additional evidence of sections 410, 428 and 540 of the Criminal Code (CRPC). He was being represented by a senior lawyer charged with retention. At the time of his trial but during the trial which lasted for about three months, no application was filed under section 4040, CCPC for recording of additional evidence, even section. In his examination under 22 under, the CCP did not mention the preparation of the Deputy Superintendent of Police. His defense not only presented the officer to prove that he (the accused) was present at his office at the time of the incident, but did not present a single witness in his defense from the said office, recording additional evidence. Not necessarily the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer