IFTIKHAR AHMED versus THE STATE
Pakistan Panel Code Ss 302/34, 449/34 & 337 F (v), as the testimony of the accused, the prosecution alleged that the FIR was filed immediately in this case, not only the witnesses He had every opportunity to look at the accused but also to identify them and had no reason to expunge the false accusation against the spit cartridges recovered from the spot, even the medical evidence from the guns recovered from the accused. The version was supported, thus, with the commission. The crime and his convictions were maintained under the circumstances of the death sentence of an accused who had no immediate purpose to attack the victim but was converted to life imprisonment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Kashmir lawyer