Find a Lawyer

ZIAUL REHMAN versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 230un law testimony (of 1984 of the 10), review the allegations, dispute with his wife about a month before the FIR was registered, which then left the accused's house Was. Along with the suspect's wife's brother, his brother released the two children into custody, allegedly going to the suspect's house to inquire about the children when the accused allegedly confessed to throwing children into the canal. Earlier, an extra-judicial confession was committed, thus, two other witnesses have been charged for such extra-judicial confession of death, the accused was told during the investigation that the investigating officer took the place in the presence of witnesses. Where the children were allegedly thrown into the canal. The accused can be recovered from this place, in his statement before the court, denied the allegation and pleaded innocent but did not present any evidence, nor did he defend himself under section 34040 (2). Although CCP gave evidence of extra-judicial confession by the accused allegedly before the prosecution witnesses, the evidence was not proved by any other evidence presented by the prosecution nor the bodies were investigated by the police. During the investigation, no evidence of any other type of evidence was obtained from the children, nor any other evidence, I also can not turn, because there has not been any crime. Such evidence by the police was, in fact, inadmissible as Article 39, the law could not be considered an exception to that testimony, 1984, the accused merely pointed to the police where the children read it. famous supreme court advocate from Thul lawyer