NAZIR AHMAD versus SULEMAN
Under the contract of sale, the plaintiff canceling the authority to resign, the property rights of the suit were not yet transferred to the plaintiff in the name of the plaintiff. The Power of Attorney was issued. The plaintiff's contention regarding the suit land was that despite the cancellation of the General Power of Attorney, defendant used the lawyer's behalf in favor of his son. The trial court ruled in this case and dismissed defendant's action. The appellate court overturned the disclosures and dismissed the trial where the suit was solely paid by the defendant on the land, usually the attorney who did not cancel the interest with the plaintiff. Could have A general attorney was not invalid but he applied the judgment and enforcement of the law. Consistency with law was based on recorded facts through evidence; High Court denied interference
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Kandhkot lawyer
