Find a Lawyer

SURAYYA KAUSAR versus MUHAMMAD ASMAT ULLAH

A. VIII, R II Contract Act (IX of 1872), Article 196 Constitution (10 of 1984), Article 95 suit was dismissed by the Attorney Plaintiff declaring that the power of attorney was fraudulent which in Pakistan was ever Registration was not registered and as such, although the legally valid Power of Attorney was not registered in Pakistan, the appointment of a certified attorney by Justice of Peace in the UK was largely informed, of which another The power of attorney was executed, the details of which were confirmed by a High Court lawyer in the UK. Another complete and comprehensive Power of Attorney was implemented in London and Foreign Affairs, Islamabad, in Pakistan, with statements of former lawyers admitting that they were never called back or canceled. And the same sub-registrar was registered before the FIRT. The appellate authority set aside the order dismissing the trial case. The agent authorized by the Power of Attorney and the Institution of Suits, valid and registered acts valid in view of the provisions contained in Section 196, Contract Act 1872, as the Principal was also present in the court at the hearing. Confessed orally that he performed all of the powers of the attorney of the jurisdiction and that nothing would be illegal so that the first appellate authority after the trial court's order was invalid in the eyes of the law. Was rightly separated. , Demanded by the High Court not to interfere with the impugned decision immigration advocates phone number from Lakki Marwat lawyer