QAMER-UN-NISSA SOOMRO versus THE STATE
Sections 4, 5 and schedule, total (ii a), (c) of the Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974, (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), S: 561, in the jurisdiction of a special court, FIR has shown that the accused Had used Kalashnikov's case before it was challaned before a session judge, as a session case but then transferred to a special court during a trial from special court to special court in session court. The exchange was made where the weapon of crime is mentioned. The FIR was Kalashnikov and more than six witnesses are yet to be investigated and the fate of the case was to be decided at the end of the trial, the trial came under the Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975 and the special court Ordered to withdraw from the trial judge's file and transfer the special judge's file to suppress the terrorist proceedings.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Haripur lawyer