Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GUL MUHAMMAD versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL)


Article 6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, the suit filed by the applicant as a tenant was rejected by the suit itself saying that the plaintiff was a tenant. Was found to be unsuccessful and such search has been retained. Evidence from the High Court has shown that the land in the dispute was being cultivated by the plaintiff / applicant's sons and that the applicant was neither a tenant nor had he personally cultivated the land at any time. It also shows that the plaintiffs / applicants were parties to the sale. The plaintiffs / applicants, in the circumstances, had no right to premature eligibility and were sued for being a party to the sale transaction. Was forced to do.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Kakul lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.