GUL MUHAMMAD versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Article 6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, the suit filed by the applicant as a tenant was rejected by the suit itself saying that the plaintiff was a tenant. Was found to be unsuccessful and such search has been retained. Evidence from the High Court has shown that the land in the dispute was being cultivated by the plaintiff / applicant's sons and that the applicant was neither a tenant nor had he personally cultivated the land at any time. It also shows that the plaintiffs / applicants were parties to the sale. The plaintiffs / applicants, in the circumstances, had no right to premature eligibility and were sued for being a party to the sale transaction. Was forced to do.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Shedani sharif lawyer
