Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHEED KHAN versus THE STATE

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Articles 409 and 161 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), section 5 (2) and s? C? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 ??? Constitutional petition ?? End of FIR ??? Etiquette in which the complainant / petition was processed, a preliminary inquiry was made and a lawsuit was filed against the accused, it was badly affected ??? No notice was given to the accused for inclusion in the preliminary inquiry? ??? The investigating officer justified a one-sided arbitrary inquiry report on the suspect's non-appearance in the aforementioned inquiry, despite his two motives, which merely intended to file a criminal case and provide a legal cover to the police for the arrest of the suspect. had gone? ? Subsequently, some additions and alterations were made to the raw and bead record to increase the gravity of the case. ??? However, the accused disclosed the fact after which the investigating officer (Assistant Director Anti? All independent officers, including the Director (Legal) and the Additional Director of Anti-Corruption, agreed with their well-understood views, but the Director, Anti? Corruption, once again displaying its hostile mind and ordered a re-investigation on completely unstable grounds? Section 409, PPC and Section 5 under their qualification as public servants, irrespective of any immovable or immovable property. Was the Crime Prevention Corruption Act, 1947 illegal and arbitrarily included in the FIR? ??? Respondents re-examined this case on false grounds best advocate from Mithi lawyer