MEHMOOD AMJED versus ISLAMABAD CAPITAL TERRITORY POLICE THROUGH I.-G. POLICE, ISLAMABAD
R13 8 (2) Development of Head Constable, Examination for splitting candidates into different batches Instead of a combined list for all batches, prepare separate seniority list for each batch of 413 other constables as well as lower school courses. Legacy Appellant was selected for. For the convenience of the police department, the candidates were divided into three batches and the appellant was placed in batch number 3 and successfully passed the course and was placed in serial number 4 of the final result of his batch, while the three Their overall position in the course was the applicant's sixth consolidation in batches that a combined sanitary list should be developed for all three batches. The fact that the formation of three separate batches affected the results of each batch, and that should have been determined in accordance with police rules, R138 (2) of 1934. Then determined the candidates' seniority instead of considering all the cohorts of the batches as a whole, according to their batches, thus the preparedness list was a clear violation of the Police Rules, 1934 KR 138 (2). As the batches were acknowledged they all passed in the same day, therefore, they would be considered simultaneously elapsed and the combined result of all such course mates in accordance with R 13 8 (2) of the Police Rules 1934. Should be kept. An appeal was granted and the police were directed to take action in accordance with R13 8 (2) of the Police Rules 1934
