Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHID versus SARDAR ALI

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Sections 24, 27 and 28 of the Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), 5 115 suits before Siam's submission (1 / 3rd) The defendants' order of the trial court was controversial under which they were required to deposit the money. Was instructed. The agricultural sum (1/3), as was the value of the value of the property mentioned in the plaintiff's change statements, was inflated, as mentioned in the change column, and the trial court directed that a certain amount be paid. Submit as Gold. The sum was unnecessary and unlawful and as such the price is not the actual value of the property in the relevant columns, the trial court was bound to determine the probable value of the property under section 2 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991. The value of the property was required only if the sale price was not determined in the sale or in the above name or when it appeared in the court that the order was a filing order, such as through the Zi Som Trial Kou. Was approved. In the presence of the plaintiffs, but they did not, at any stage, object to the property that the value of the property was increased, unlawfully, in any case, 1 / 3rd of the property mentioned by the trial court. Was ordered to collect. Transition trial court cannot, therefore, be interfered with registration advocate from Kunri lawyer