SARDAR MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 302 (b) / 34 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Definition of Section 164 Proof Could Not Be Motivated Against Defendant's Protests Proved by Someone's Relatives Didn't happen The extra-judicial confession made by the accused before the open source repression / relationship of the deceased did not encourage the trust because any such statement under Section 1641, CRPC, was filed within 5/6 days of the magistrate. The weapons recovered were not recorded before the recovery. The arrest of the suspects seems to have been fabricated and highly suspected. The evidence of the prosecution was complete with clear contradictions, material contradictions and contradictions on all points and not credible ??? The suspects' participation in the incident was suspected to have been involved in the crime because of a relationship with the original suspect, the accused was acquitted in circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Chowk Munda lawyer