Rule 9 and 115 of the Civil Code 1908 Rule and Suit Rehabilitation Amendment jurisdiction for damages, the use of the plaintiff / defendant purchased the land in dispute, but the plaintiff / applicant not only seized the disputed land to the plaintiff / defendant Refusing to grant, the plaintiff / defendant filed a lawsuit for damages and profits, on which the defendant / applicant claimed that the civil court had no jurisdiction in the matter because it was exclusively the revenue authority's jurisdiction. I was in control. Canceled because it was not only brought before the lower courts, but it was also not requested that the plaintiff / applicant was a tenant in the plaintiff / plaintiff lawsuit, in which the messenger was liable for profit and loss of use and possession of land. Harmful to and filed by the defendant / defendant. Was found to be properly applicable to a civil court, at the same time by the courts on the basis of the facts and evidence on record, following the findings of the court proceedings, in the exercise of its amended jurisdiction by the High Court. Cannot be interrupted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
