Find a Lawyer

W.T. AS. NOS.350/IB TO 352/IB OF 1997-98 versus W.T. AS. NOS.350/IB TO 352/IB OF 1997-98

Sections 2 (M) and 2 (16) Registration Act (XVI of 1908) Section 49 Net Wealth Estimates were allotted for the year 1994 95 to 1996 97 and the plot was examined by the Federal Government Employees Housing Foundation. And the plot was worth checking. Equivalent to Price: The market value of this plot was adopted after considering the prices of their plots sold in open markets of other plots paid by the SCC officer. Assisi said the plot was allotted on the basis of a 27-year agreement. 2 1994 The capital development authority still owns the property and consumer rights within and beyond the plot, according to the contract for the construction of the house and as such, the assessee cannot be said to have the plot. It has no title or title to it, because no sales contract was signed by the authority in favor of the assessee, therefore, the Assessing Officer had mistakenly obtained the right of ownership. Or the plot was complete and complete while the registrant between the registrar and the authority of the detector was in agreement with the valid contracts of the Act, 1908. There was a confrontation that required that the sale of immovable property should be made through the Registered Document Section 49, Registration Act, 1908. The document did not eliminate the valid entry or sale interest on the property, nor did it have to meet the law's requirement to legalize such transfer for the buyer, therefore, the plot according to this question Was not the legal owner of which the title was transferred to the Essex and the same was not transferred to the Assisi advocate from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer